Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What do you think is necessary in order to have an excellentcomposition?



Quoting margaret noble <margaretnoble2000@yahoo.com>:

> what is a great composition to you?

To me, I enjoy works that appeal on all levels: physical,  
intellectual, and spritual.  I find that when I return to great  
compositions, I can always find new things in them that I didn't catch  
before.

> particular structures?

Most great works exhibit some unifying element.  It could be a motiv,  
a theme, or perhaps just a rhythmic motiv.   Music without some kind  
of unifying elements tends to become amorphous and, well... to me just  
kind of boring.

> rise/build and climax?

Sometimes.  Some great minimalist work achieves almost hypnotic  
effects and dramatic climaxes would be counter to the style.  The  
"climax" idea is a romantic notion and suggests music that is dramatic  
and emotional.  There are great works that are quite dramatic and  
others that are understated.

> elements of surprise?

I don't think surprise is very important.  After all, the surprise  
only occurs on the first hearing.  On subsequent listenings, it is no  
longer a surprise.  Bruno Walter, when writing about the music of  
Mahler, said that the true test of art is that "after the newness and  
novelty wears off is there underlying beauty?"

> predictability?

Great comedians have written that, when delivering a routine, you  
don't want every line to get a laugh.  I suppose the same holds for  
music -- every bar does NOT have to contain a something new.  When the  
key, rhythm, motivs, etc... are completely unpredictable, the result  
becomes raucous at first and then just boring.

Unpredictability is like "spice" -- a little here and there gives  
interest. Too much and the meal becomes unpalletable.

> tonal structures?
> rhythmic structures?
> depth and reverb?
> frequency distribution?

I don't know if any of these qualities are indicators of greatness  
when it comes to compositions.

> quality of sound?

Many a great musician has "rocked the house" with crummy equipment but  
most of us would prefer to play in optimal conditions.

A great sound system doesn't assure great music however great music  
will better reach its potential with a great sound system.

> what else?

Margaret, I wish I knew what makes a great composition.  If I did, I'd  
be writing them!

The best that I can do, as a composer, is to be true to myself and not  
try to be someone who I am not.  I attempt to write music that will  
give moments of entertainment and inspiration to listeners.

I have found that if I tell myself, "Today I am going to write a GREAT  
composition that will be A BIG ARTISTIC STATEMENT... that I completely  
shut down!"  Nothing I write measures up to the grand cosmic statement  
I wish to make.

Thus, I just compose stuff and don't worry about greatness.


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!