If there’s a piece of software that
you know isn’t available that you absolutely must have, then yes, boot
camp will be anywhere from 10-20% more efficient from a CPU standpoint than
parallels. Latency to other hardware (audio) isn’t typically
affected that badly, but there’s some. I would venture to
guess however that 99.9% of the software you’re thinking of either is
already available on OSX, or has a near copy from some other vendor or OSS provider. What do
you often use in PC land? All of the office productivity stuff (again
99%) is available, and usually better in OSX land.
-miles
From: Veda, Qua
[mailto:qua.veda@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007
1:11 PM
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: OT:Mac: bootcamp
For
best performance with music applications running on a new MacBook , would
it be better to use "bootcamp" to create a dual booting environment,
and put music applications in the Mac side and personal/business on the Windows
side?
Or
can email, web browsing, personal finance, power point etc co-exist in
the MacOS enviroment (via emulation) without causing peformance problems
for the music applications, latency ,etc
thanks
-Qua
