Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fractal loops (was: keeping loops interesting)



Jeff Larson wrote:
> The problem here is that bouncing is not instantaneous, you have
> to let the loop play once to bounce the track.

But watching a fractal grow was always more fun than the finished 
picture...

There is not only a limit in the machines, there is also a limit in our 
ears and/or perception. If you do rythmical fractals, you will pretty 
fast create sounds instead of rythms and you need to leave enough holes 
to still hear the rythms...
And if thouse sounds sound nice is another question...
So maybe the other way around is better, take a (nice) sound and go 
higher till you hear a rythm. But if this rythms sounds nice...

Endless space for experimentation...

Stefan

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|\-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!