



			Support Looper's Delight!!

Looper's Delight Looper Profiles Tools of the Trade Tips and Tricks Musings History of Looping Loopography Rec. Reading Mailing List Info Mailing List Archive File Library




Support Looper's Delight!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: improv vs arrangement

To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com,mark sottilaro <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com>
From: "nick@12testing.net" <nick@12testing.net>
Subject: Re: improv vs arrangement
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:40:39 +0100

On 27 Jul 2006 at 11:07, mark sottilaro wrote:

> > --- "nick@12testing.net" <nick@12testing.net> wrote:
> > Due largely to the technicalities (an old jamman), I'm 100% improvised,

> I don't understand that statement.  The old JamMan
> seems really well suited for arranged premeditated
> loops in a song type of structure... 

Sorry, I didn't make myself clear - I meant by comparison with the 
modern machines, where you can easily store multiple loops and switch 
/ mix between them to create an arrangement, rather than the jamman 
"buld up, fade away" variety.

All the best,

Nick Robinson

References:
- Re: improv vs arrangement
  - From: mark sottilaro <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Staying on the Looping topic
Next by Date: Re: organized or improvised (was: Favorite Five Threads on L.D.)
Prev by thread: Re: improv vs arrangement
Next by thread: Re: Favorite Five Threads on L.D.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us

Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!