Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the truth about true bypass




>In my ungoing research to set up a good pedalboard
>that wont deteriorate tone now i find out that true
>bypass is not the answer either just thought i share
>this info with you:
>http://www.petecornish.co.uk/case_against_true_bypass.html
>Luis

Rather that's a cookbook of how to use a long chain of true bypass FX 
without problems.
( apart from Charles' observation )

With that system he described it only takes one cheap( or otherwise) 
FX with a degraded bypass to spoil things.

Apart from that, notice that the cable length maths which pretends to 
prove the point is pretty stupid if you actually think about it :-)


andy butler


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!
Please support Looper's Delight, buy something from Amazon!
Please support Looper's Delight, buy something from Amazon!