Re: RC-50 FEEDBACK WORKS

[mark sottilaro <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com>]

I agree.  As much as I wanted to love the RC-20 for
it's form factor alone, I want to find someone at
Roland and punch them for not bothering to include
what a lot of people consider base functionality.

Really at this point why bother monkeying around with
the RC-20 when a used Repeater can be purchased with
is's own flawed OS? ;)  The quirky Repeater still
seems to be a better product than the RC-20 from what
I can see.  If you really need something on the floor
you're probably better off with an Electro-Harmonix
2880, no?

--- Charles Zwicky <cazwicky@earthlink.net> wrote:

> 
> 
> Seriously, that workaround is as arcane as roland's
> O/S is to begin 
> with. It hasn't changed my mind about the flawwed
> RC-50...


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com