Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LOOP] Re: Re: 10 year's anniversary of Looper's Delight ?



On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Krispen Hartung wrote:

> Well, you guys could be humorous and record a full length looping song, 
>and 
> then use Acid or something like it to shrink it down to 30 second....for 
> those stretched out and slow moving ambient pieces, it might sound 
> interesting, like watching a flower bloom using time lapse videography.

Actually, I used to go the other way, using the tempo changing without 
pitchshifting feature of the Repeater to take a riff or even a single 
long note and stretch it - I found interesting the small shifts that 
became apparent when you took a single whole note and stretched it from 
120bpm all the way out to 1 bpm.

best,
Steve B  Subscape Annex  http://www.subscapeannex.com/

> K-
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <burnett@pobox.com>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 10:36 AM
> Subject: Re: Re: 10 year's anniversary of Looper's Delight ?
>
>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Fox" <billyfox@soundscapes.us>
>>> 
>>> I realize that your space may be limited, but I feel the need to point 
>out 
>>> that 30 seconds often is shorter than my typical loop length!  ;-) 
>Still, 
>>> I'm planning on coming up with a loop to contribute.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bill
>> 
>> Indeed. I went ahead and used it as a constraint I wouldn't normally 
>adhere 
>> to, to see what I'd do that I might not normally. Nice challenge for me.
>> 
>> One of the self-challenges I came up with a while back was to use only 
>> no-longer-manufactured gear for a set of sessions I called "planned 
>> obsolescence" - that's not a hard challenge for most of us here, but it 
>did 
>> mean I had to not play either of my primary instruments, or use the 
>> majority of my favorite effects.
>> 
>> best,
>> Steve B  Subscape Annex  http://www.subscapeannex.com/


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!