Re: RC-50 vs. Repeater?

[mark sottilaro <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com>]

Judging by what people are saying about the RC-50, it
seems to me that the Repeater blows it away if you're
interested in nicely midi synced loops.  Repeater
doesn't have USB, but it does have a CFC card so you
can transfer your loops... I find I rarely do that
anyway.  Easier to record them into the computer as
it's my clock source anyway.  That way as my loop
changes in a <100% feedback (what?  OH RIGHT THE RC-50
can't do that!) I have early and late versions of the
loop recorded.

Who cares about 49 minutes of loop time?  Silly. 
Repeater with a 256 meg card is PLENTY.  If you need
more get yourself a computer.  Also, 99 4 track loops.
 Easy to go from one to another.

Mark

--- Buzap Buzap <buzap@gmx.net> wrote:

> Hi Guys
> 
> how would you compare the advantages of RC-50 versus
> Electrix Repeater?
> 
> RC-50:
> - more memory (49 minutes mono)
> - 7 pedals "included"
> - USB connection
> - Shifting between patches (1 patch = 3 phrases = 3
> loops) possible
> - ...
> 
> Repeater:
> - better Tempo Sync?
> - 4 Loops in parallel
> - ...
> 
> best regards
> Buzap
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
> "Feel free" mit GMX DSL!
> http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com