Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: EDP syncing LoopIII vs LoopIV



how I understand your problem ???
2 things
1- the quantized behaviour of the strt rec point is the only way in loop3
when sync IN.
loop 4 allows you to strt rec at any point and end rec  will be rounded to
the next cycle point
2-the cycle (initial loop time) is determined by the 8th params
changing it will allow you to have different lenght cycle 8 8th= 1 meas in
4/4  4 8th = Half note etc...

Trust us all you wont regret your loop 4 upgrade

Claude




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "AvgJoe" <paul_sanders@adelphia.net>
To: <loopers-delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 6:09 PM
Subject: EDP syncing LoopIII vs LoopIV


> Hi all,
>
> I just want to make sure I'm understanding something as a limitation in
> LoopIII before I count on LoopIV to resolve my problem.
>
> My EDP has LoopIII. I'm syncing to midi clock from my Emu PX-7. I'll be
> playing a drum pattern for instance. I want to be able to hit record on
the
> EDP, have it start right away, and hit record (or alt ending) again and
have
> it stop and loop from that point.
>
> The behavior I'm getting as I understand it is quantize is working with
this
> start of pattern pulse from the PX7, so if the pattern is 4 bars long and
I
> only want to loop 1 or 2 bars, my loop is padded with silence ot fill in
the
> pattern cycle from the PX7.
>
> I read the LoopIII based manual and tried to read between the lines ot
> figure out things that aren't clearly stated there. I futzed with this 
>for
> quite some time last night. Is this in fact a limitation of LoopIII that
is
> resolved in LoopIV?
>
> In reading through the LoopIV manual, "SyncRecord" appears to be what I'm
> after, but it's not clear from what I've read what happens if I'm playing
a
> 4 bar drum pattern and only record 2 bars in the loop. It talks about
> keeping track of the loop cycle count, etc, but that to me implies I 
>would
> be recording more than 4 bars in this example. Do I have ot record to 
>some
> cycle boundry? What happens if I record 5 bars, which is 1 cycle + 1 bar
of
> the 2nd cycle.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Paul
>