RE: midi looper

["Jim Palmer" <jimp@pobox.com>]

note that i said "feasible" not "possible"
you would need a pretty elaborate interface to allow for
arbitrary transform functions, which makes it a bit difficult
to implement in dedicated hardware...

maybe what i really meant was "inconfeasible"

"you keep using that word. i do not think it means what you think it 
means..."
-inigo montoya

> 
> On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 08:19 AM, Jim Palmer wrote:
> >>
> > these are some really cool ideas, but i think only feasible in a
> > software looper.
> >
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean by that, as doesn't all software 
> ultimately 
> run on hardware?  Whether or not it's a PC or some dedicated 
> device may 
> have issues in the cost of development, I couldn't imagine how they 
> would effect the possibility of such a device.  Usually dedicated 
> hardware is a bit better for such things.
> 
> Mark Sottilaro
>