Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Linux looper: Sooperlooper...



Damn 
Thats incredible, I really wish this could be written for Mac osx licensed
by Matthias and Kim. That would be incredible.
As it stands it seems a little unfair to just rip another persons invention
so obviously. At least the author isn't trying to make money of it though.
 
Damn why doesn't anyone write a de3cent looper for the Mac.
Geoff    

on 17/3/03 8:07 pm, Jesse Ray Lucas at jlucas@neoprimitive.net wrote:

> I have been watching Linux, but so far there just isn't enough really 
>good
> audio software (or maybe I'm just not aware of it) available to make me
> think the switch is viable.  Although, now that Mac has gone UNIX-based 
>with
> OSX, maybe some of those developers might start thinking about porting to
> Linux.  It would be a smaller leap now...
> 
> Hey, look at what I just found on one of those Linux pages:
> 
> "Sooperlooper is a "looping sampler very much like the Gibson/Oberheim
> Echoplex Digital Pro". It is written by Jesse Chappell and is available 
>from
> http://dexterssandbox.com/sooperlooper/."
> 
> "SooperLooper is a looping sampler very much like the Gibson/Oberheim
> Echoplex Digital Pro (EDP). In fact, it is a downright emulation of an 
>EDP,
> with some additional features and a silly name. I figured that the EDP
> feature-set is powerful, proven, and popular -- so why not implement it 
>as a
> LADSPA plugin we can all use? It is a true realtime software looper if 
>used
> with a low-latency Linux kernel and the proper audio buffer 
>configuration."
> 
> I see this has been mentioned in the archives before, but just in case 
>you
> are brave, thinking Linux, and haven't heard.
> 
> -J
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Palmer" <jimp@pobox.com>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:18 AM
> Subject: RE: Realtime os (was kim's refreshing...)
> 
> 
>>> ...
>>> I wonder why enterprises like Apple dont create a real time version
>>> of their OS, limited and optimized for specific use.
>>> In most studios I see a Mac with nothing but ProTools installed to
>>> make it safe. They have a second computer for Internet and such. So
>>> an OS that looks like the MacOS but only serves audio soft would
>>> certainly be much safer and quicker...
>>> ...
>> 
>> i am not personally involved in this, but there is a group doing just
>> this for linux:
>> http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/resourceslatency.php3
>> 
>> http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/
>> 
>> sadly, i have not had time to look into it deeply, but
>> on the surface, it looks like they have got latency down to
>> low single digit ms (i've seen 1.5ms claimed)
>> 
>> this is on my (rather long) list of things to check out...
>> 
>