Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
richard and fellow repeater users... > - Is there any way to have the inputs on the > repeater > have unique track ownership? > > hi evan - just wondering if you could input one of > the instruments through > the returns 3&4 (the other instrument plugged in > normally), then use the > fx>insert and resample options to capture new loops > this way interesting though, but wouldn't this still record both instruments? it would definately give me the option of dropping out one instrument to create a quick sample/loop, but ideally i'd like to have both instruments working independently through the repeater...or better yet, send one through with a buypass so one instrument is captured when i record and the other just continues playing. i'd also like to be able to do this without having to drop out the filter factory i have running into the repeater. .....i.e. > instead of mixing down an existing loop, it creates > a completely new sample > from the fx returns. right, but when you create a loop while the effects are on your live input, the loop is recorded with the effects. you cannot record while effects are on without having the effects recorded as well. you might need a 'silent' track > to mix down initially > though...... i could do that muting tracks by panning as well... > not sure if this makes sense, i'll try > it myself & if there is > any substance to it i'll let u know. > please do, you have some interesting ideas and i feel that without a mixing board, i'm going to need to devise a macguyver-esque technique to accomplish what i'm trying to do. thanks for the input! ~ e evanmeyers@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com