Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
My favorite review is from a live gig. I was in playing in a bar band in the southeast and a fairly drunk local boy came up to the stage a yelled; "Hey man, some ya'all are goooood!" we never did find out which of us he was referring to. k Greg House wrote: > --- matt davignon <mattdavignon@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Well, when you something to be reviewed, you're asking for an opinion >from > > an unbiased pair of ears. > > I don't think you ever get an "unbiased" pair of ears, just ears with >biases > which may be different from your own. But yeah, you are definitely >exposing > yourself for ridicule. > > > My advice would be to consider his points, determine which of them have > > merit, then figure out which of those could be improved, and which ones > > can't be fixed without comprimising what's unique about your music. > > I've heard Scott's music now (thanks!) and I can definitely say that I >think the > reviewer was seriously offbase. While the recording isn't without >faults, the > reviewer didn't even get onto the most serious of them, choosing to slam >stuff > that's subjective (artistic choice) instead. Given what I've heard, I'd >say the > review isn't really all that interesting, since this guy seems prone to >slam on > something just because he doesn't like it. And he seesm overly harsh and > unconstructive too. I heard nothing on this recording that even remotely > qualifies as "mindless guitar wank". > > > Also consider that music that requires a technical understanding of the > > process (for example, knowing what "looping" is) is often a hard sell >to > > non-musicians. > I don't think an understanding of looping is necessary for this >recording. > Perhaps an appreciation for ambient type music would help, but how it >was created > really isn't the point here. > > Greg > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com