Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Please Support Looper's Delight! Any donation is appreciated!
Please Support Looper's Delight! Any donation is appreciated!
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Do you even know the definition of the word influential?!





Kim Flint wrote:

> Thanks Chris! I'm amazed at how perfectly you just proved my point while
> trying to argue against it.
>
> In case you haven't noticed, the 80's really did end. 1982 really was
> decades ago. The rest of the world has moved on. Sorry about that. My
> childhood heroes are old and dusty and unpopular now too.

There must be something wrong with me. I still enjoy music that was created
more than 10 years ago. Does something have to be currently popular to be
considered relevant? Many artists with significant long term impact were 
not
popular during their lifetimes, or while they were producing a particular
style.
After all, if you are trying to do something new and different, it is not
likely to be popular.


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!