Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CD Mastering Windows Software



I have to say I have not ever had results like you describe with T-Racks
unless the Comp/Limiter settings were extreme- to call it "completely
unusable" would be a diservice to this product IMO- my 2 ciggadies. Ozone
sounds cool- cheers for the heads up-

Cliff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan El-Bizri" <ssrndpty@hotmail.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: CD Mastering Windows Software


> Hi all,
>
>     Long time no see.
>
> > I just found a new mastering plug-in that I'm probably going to start
> using.
> > It's by Izotope and the plug-in is named Ozone.
> > http://www.thedirectxfiles.com/manufacturers/iz_ozone.htm. The sound
> quality
> > is awesome (it uses 64-bit processing) and it features a paragraphic 
>EQ,
> > loudness maximizer, multiband dynamics, multiband stereo imager (keep
the
> > bass tight, spread the harmonics, etc), multiband harmonic exciter, a
> > mastering reverb, and spectrum and phase meters all in one plug-in. I
> really
> > like the interface, you'll need to see it to understand.
> >
>
> I agree. This is the best all-in-one mastering tool I've seen yet - 
>forget
> T-rex, (which sounds awful IMHO - so much pumping and wobbliness -
> completely unusable). If you have the cpu for it, it's currently the last
> word in mastering. It's almost more intuitive, though nothing about
> multiband compression and eq will ever be completely devoid of some
fumbling
> around in the dark for me :>
>
> > My only complaint is that it's really processor intensive, and I can
only
> > run 4 or 5 of its effects simultaneously in SONAR on my decrepit 
>Pentium
> II
> > - 333 MHz with 384 MB of RAM. I'm running SONAR on a system under its
> > minimum requirements so I guess I shouldn't complain.
> >
>
> Yes -  it's a total hog, but that's to be expected - you are running the
> equivalent of 8 64-bit plugins back-to-back. Ouch.
>
> You say you are mastering in sonar. I assume you are you mixing down
first?
>
> I would recomend using an offline editor, such as sound forge, to use all
> the processes at once. Using my almost similarly decrepit dual PII 400, I
> take snippets of the song, stuff them together to make a shorter, newer
file
> with representative portions of each part plus any trouble spots, master
> that file, and then master the original with the same settings.
>
> Jonathan
>



Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!