



			Support Looper's Delight!!

Looper's Delight Looper Profiles Tools of the Trade Tips and Tricks Musings History of Looping Loopography Rec. Reading Mailing List Info Mailing List Archive File Library




Support Looper's Delight!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: conceptual art and improvisation/Abstract vs. concrete

To: "'Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com'" <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
From: "Liebig, Steuart A." <Steuart.Liebig@maritz.com>
Subject: RE: conceptual art and improvisation/Abstract vs. concrete
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:52:10 -0400

Title: RE: conceptual art and improvisation/Abstract vs. concrete

>i had a very similar experience with schoenberg.
i have been greatly influenced by his methodology,
but i almost never listen to his compositions...
i think in this case it was the fact that i found the abolition of
tonal center to be somewhat tedious. <

** does it depend on which era of schoenberg you listen to? some of his early stuff is very much in the late romantic tradition (wagner, mahler, r. strauss) - - not a hint of free atonality or 12-tone music.

stig

Follow-Ups:
- Re: conceptual art and improvisation/Abstract vs. concrete
  - From: jim palmer <jimp@pobox.com>

Prev by Date: Re: EDP "Next Loop" question
Next by Date: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V01 #563
Prev by thread: Re: conceptual art and improvisation/Abstract vs. concrete
Next by thread: Re: conceptual art and improvisation/Abstract vs. concrete
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us

Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!