Re: boomerang vs. headrush

["Alan Imberg" <alan_i@sprynet.com>]

My papa told me not to talk to strangers in casual conversation about 2
things: religion and politics. I think I can add gear preferences to that
list.

----- Original Message -----
From: Unit Circle Media <unitcirc@unitcircle.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: boomerang vs. headrush


> > In a message dated 99-08-12 11:34:29 EDT, you write:
> >
> > << I've got both.  Definitely if you can afford the Boomerang, it's a
much
> >  better looper than the headrush. >>
> >
> > I completely disagree.  If you use distorted, mangled guitar maybe... 
>if
> > however you're after clean loops of vocals or crystal clear PCM 
>keyboard
> > loops, the headrush has superior sound quality over the 'Rang. Period.
Maybe
> > the Boomerang is A BETTER LOOPER FOR YOU....NOT FOR ME.
> >
> Yeah, I think it was assumed that I was stating my opinion.  As I said, I
> have both.  For what I do, the control (and loop length) I get with my
> rang far overwhelms the sound quality of the headrush.
>
> This is starting to feel like a religious argument.
>
>
> Kevin
>