] [Thread Prev
RE: boomerang vs. headrush
i don't have a boomerang, but i would think that the reverse and half/twice
speed (right?) functions would be worth it. the headrush has neither. if
want those capabilities, i would go for it. or you could wait for the line
thing to see how that works.
i got the headrush because it was small, had echo simulation, digital and a
tap-tempo looper (which my eh16 doesn't have). i think that the akai is
fairly decent for what it does. no complaints except the somewhat confusing
start or loop/end of loop switch interface (problem?) that others have
> I don't want to start any wars but I was all set to buy a Headrush but
> seems possible (if i work a little overtime) for me to get a boomerang.
> what i want to know is since the rang is at least twice the money is it
> twice as good as looper? i don't care about the headrush's tape
> simulation... i want a good looper that's easy to use live with a simple
> guitar set up (no midi or anything). i know this subject has come up
> but there seems to be a lot of mixed views as of late. Anyone own both?
> the rang worth the extra bucks? (what should i expect to pay for the