] [Thread Prev
Re: Looper CD
Doug Michael writes:
> Count me in for the Looper's CD along with the $100.00 to get it done.
> There is a very good article on doing a project like this (CD over the
> internet) in the latest Keyboard magazine - Janurary 1998. The article
> describes the internet compilation CD "Giant Tracks." It ended up being
> completed in a very professional way, many people contributed their
> talents and they did the web site thing with samples of each tune. There
> is included a breakdown of costs and they actually sold enough CD's to
> make a little profit. Anyways I'll check to see if this article is on
> Keyboard mag web site.
> Doug Michael
Another list I'm on (the didjeridu list) recently put out a similar
compilation, which was hugely successful. Some relevant facts are:
o The list is about the same size as this one.
o The final CD is just about 74 minutes, with ~ 25 3-minute tracks.
o Submissions were limited to one per person, and mostly fixed at 3
Everyone who sent in a tape ended up on the CD. Most of the people
on the disc ended up bought multiple copies, so there was no additional
o ~ 500 discs were pressed at first and sold for $15 each, to list-members
and through a music store one member runs. I believe they're all sold
o The biggest unforseen problem ended up being what to do with the
left-over $$. Nearly everyone had strong opinions and they all
differed... the most popular options were a) send back profit to
contributors; b) donate it to non-profits in Australia; b) bankroll
it in making a 2nd CD. Beats me what ended up happening.
o One list-member took nearly-entire control for collecting submissions,
producing, mastering, printing, and distributing the disc. He had
experience in doing such things before and -- as he works at a
professional studio -- was able to use their facilities for free.
90% of the time invested was his, and it would have been done far
less efficiently by committee. Other list-members a) designed the
cover art, and b) did a once-over review of a cassette before the
disc was pressed.
The final CD ended up looking and sounding very professional. The only
negatives really came from the compilation format: lots of short
tracks. The liner notes couldn't include anything more than names and
track titles, and ended up mostly on the web. Nevertheless, it's a
fun, diverse, and highly interesting disc.
I'd be happy to forward the the address of the compiler to anyone who's
interested -- don't have it right now.
I believe there's at least one other didj member on this list -- any