



			Support Looper's Delight!!

Looper's Delight Looper Profiles Tools of the Trade Tips and Tricks Musings History of Looping Loopography Rec. Reading Mailing List Info Mailing List Archive File Library




Support Looper's Delight!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Analog Echoplex

To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
From: The Man Himself <altruist@shoko.calarts.edu>
Subject: Re: Analog Echoplex
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 21:44:20 -0700 (PDT)

On Thu, 17 Oct 1996 Paulpop@ssnet.com wrote:

> Digital is always a compromise sonically.  You will never find the 
>lushness
> of tape echo coming out of an Echoplex.

Nor out of a JamMan...

--Andre

References:
- Re: Analog Echoplex
  - From: Paulpop@ssnet.com (Paul Poplawski, Phd)

Prev by Date: Okay, let's get philosophical: Performance Theory time
Next by Date: "This thing should not exist!" or: Pain through Quadrophonics
Prev by thread: Re: digital vs analog?
Next by thread: Re: Analog vs. Digital
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us

Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!

Support Looper's Delight, buy something from zZounds!